For decades, the idea of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital served as a rare and powerful rallying cry that united the Arab world.
Kings and dictators stumped for it, priests and imams prayed for it, jihadists and protesters died for it, and militant groups and political parties campaigned for it — naming their television stations, boulevards and even themselves, after Al Quds, the Arabic name for the holy city.
In officially recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel on Wednesday, President Trump struck what many considered the death blow to those aspirations, handing a major victory to Israel in the perennial struggle between Jews and Arabs for control of the Holy Land.
But as Arab and Muslim leaders raised their voices to condemn the move, many across the Middle East wondered if so much had changed in recent years that the real Arab response would amount to little more than a whimper.
While Arab leaders have continued to pay lip service to the Palestinian cause, it has slipped in importance, displaced by the Arab Spring uprisings, the wars in Iraq, Syria and Yemen, the threat of the Islamic State, and the contest between Saudi Arabia and Iran for regional dominance. Persian Gulf states like Saudi Arabia, more concerned about their rivalry with Iran, have found their interests increasingly overlapping with those of Israel.
Continue reading the main story
But while the passion for the Palestinian cause among many Arabs was genuine, those in power often exploited it for their own aims.
When Hezbollah, the Lebanese militia and political party formed to fight Israel, sent fighters to help save President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, its leader, Hassan Nasrallah, claimed in a speech that “the road to Jerusalem” went through a list of Syrian cities, including Aleppo.
The Palestinians’ Arab defenders have meanwhile shifted their own priorities.
Egypt, for instance, was once a reliable font of pro-Palestinian anger, where protests against Israel regularly erupted in the 1990s and 2000s. But years of harsh repression under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, combined with broader anxiety over regional stability, have curtailed public protests.
As Damascus, Cairo and Baghdad — three traditional centers of Arab power — have weakened, Saudi Arabia has sought to assert itself.
While its royals and monarchs once spoke frequently of the Palestinian cause, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, 32, who effectively rules the country, has barely addressed the issue in public.
Mr.Sisi and King Salman of Saudi Arabia are among Mr. Trump’s biggest boosters in the Arab world. At a summit in Riyadh in May, the three leaders stood together over a glowing orb for a photo that appeared to cement their alliance, even as it inspired a rash of mocking internet memes.
In September, Mr.Sisi met for the first time in public with the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, lending smiling optics to a relationship that had been quietly blossoming, largely over security issues, for several years and Saudi Arabia is widely believed to be expanding covert intelligence cooperation with Israel.
But Trump’s decision on Jerusalem has put his allies in the uncomfortable position of having to turn on him, at least verbally.
King Salman called the American move “a dangerous step likely to inflame the passions of Muslims around the world.”
Mr. Sisi’s office said that he had spoken with the president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, and that both men lamented a decision that “overlooks the special position of Jerusalem for Arabs and Muslims.”
King Abdullah II of Jordan, another American ally, said the decision would have “dangerous repercussions on the stability and security of the region.”
Outside the Arab world, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey called Jerusalem “ a red line for Muslims” and threatened to cut off relations with Israel.
“This is the new adventure of global arrogance in the region,” said President Hassan Rouhani of Iran.
It was still possible that Mr. Trump’s declaration could have the effect of moving the Palestinian issue to the front burner, but the emotions were as much of sadness and resignation as of anger and threats. An explosion of violence could still come, but so far there is something more but an explosion of sighs.
In some ways, the move is symbolic and only confirms the grim view of the Palestinian future. People in the region have long seen the United States as deeply biased toward Israel and the hopes for a viable Palestinian state as fading.
But the American declaration casts into doubt the most important Palestinian hope that was still seen as achievable: a capital in East Jerusalem. Calling Jerusalem the Israeli capital without acknowledging its significance to Arabs comes off to them as a denial of the Muslim and Arab perspective, analysts said.
“For Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims, it has the same effect that denial of Jewish claims to Jerusalem has to Jews,” said Barnett R. Rubin, a former senior State Department adviser.
Moreover, he said, the move “confirms the narrative that the U.S. is at war with Islam and has no respect for Muslim and Arab perspectives.”
That perception is likely to damage the standing of the United States in the region.
The move could also strengthen Iran, giving it back the mantle of resistance it lost when it sided with Syria’s government against an uprising. The elite force of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, led by Qasim Souleimani, is called the Quds Force, named for Jerusalem.
The focus on Jerusalem may also provide fresh ammunition to violent extremists in the region. The Islamic State’s powerful affiliate in Egypt was born from the militant group Ansar al Bait al-Maqdas, whose name translates as “Supporters of Jerusalem.”
“We just handed them a claim to lead the cause,” Mr. Rubin said.
The article originally appeared in The NewYork Times